alaska: is less densely populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.65
, region
Weight: 0.62
, country
Weight: 0.62
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less densely populated 1.00
is sparsely populated 0.89
is populated 0.86
is populated state 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(canada, is sparsely populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(region, is populated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(canada, is sparsely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(canada, is sparsely populated)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(south america, is sparsely populated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(south america, is populated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(canada, is sparsely populated)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(alberta, is populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(alberta, is populated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(south america, is populated)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(south america, is populated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(south america, is sparsely populated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(south america, is sparsely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(alaska, is less densely populated)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alaska, is populated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is sparsely populated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(alaska, is sparsely populated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alaska, is populated state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(alaska, is sparsely populated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alaska, is populated state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(alaska, is populated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(alaska, is populated state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alaska, is sparsely populated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(alaska, is populated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is populated state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(canada, is sparsely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(alberta, is populated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(south america, is populated)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(south america, is sparsely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(alaska, is less densely populated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(canada, is sparsely populated)