region: is populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is populated 1.00
is densely populated 0.88
is sparsely populated 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(east asia, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(east asia, is populated)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(east asia, is populated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(east asia, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(region, is populated)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(region, is densely populated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(region, is densely populated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(region, is densely populated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(region, is sparsely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(east asia, is populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(east asia, is densely populated)