alexandria: was important city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, city
Weight: 0.53
, port
Weight: 0.51
, town
Weight: 0.51
, center
Weight: 0.49
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.28
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.28
, new york city
Weight: 0.27
, village
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important city 1.00
was city 0.94
was unique city 0.88
was important to development 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(alexandria, was important city)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(alexandria, was city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(alexandria, was city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(alexandria, was unique city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was unique city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alexandria, was unique city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was unique city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was important to development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(alexandria, was important to development)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was important to development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(alexandria, was important to development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was important city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alexandria, was important city)