alexandria: was unique city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, city
Weight: 0.53
, port
Weight: 0.51
, town
Weight: 0.51
, center
Weight: 0.49
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.28
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.28
, new york city
Weight: 0.27
, village
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was unique city 1.00
was unique 0.89
was important city 0.88
was city 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(alexandria, was unique city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was unique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was important city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(alexandria, was city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(alexandria, was city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(alexandria, was unique)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(alexandria, was important city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(alexandria, was unique)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was unique)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(alexandria, was important city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alexandria, was important city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was unique city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(alexandria, was unique city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alexandria, was unique city)