algebra: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, high school
Weight: 0.56
, study
Weight: 0.56
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, quaternion
Weight: 0.39
, calculus
Weight: 0.34
, school district
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be used in aerospace engineering 0.88
be important in computer science 0.77
be important in field of science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(algebra, be important in engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(algebra, be important in field of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in field of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(algebra, be important in field of science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in field of science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(linear algebra, be important in computer science)