algebra: be used in aerospace engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, high school
Weight: 0.56
, study
Weight: 0.56
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, quaternion
Weight: 0.39
, calculus
Weight: 0.34
, school district
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in aerospace engineering 1.00
be important in engineering 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(algebra, be important in engineering)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in engineering)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in engineering)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(algebra, be important in engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(linear algebra, be used in aerospace engineering)