algorithm: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be value of money 0.77
has quality system 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be value of money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(concept, be value of money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(search engine, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(search engine, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concept, be value of money)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(regression, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(neural network, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(neural network, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be value of money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(triangulation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(triangulation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(neural network, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(neural network, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(neural network, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(neural network, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(regression, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(regression, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(algorithm, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(concept, be value of money)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(neural network, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(neural network, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(triangulation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(regression, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(concept, be value of money)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)