hash table: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents table
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, algorithm
Weight: 0.54
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.39
, coffee table
Weight: 0.39
, dining table
Weight: 0.39
, table saw
Weight: 0.37
, sofa
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(table, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(algorithm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(table, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(table, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(table, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(table, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sofa, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sofa, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(table, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(algorithm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(algorithm, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sofa, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sofa, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sofa, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sofa, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hash table, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hash table, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(table, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(table, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sofa, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sofa, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality worth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(table, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(table, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hash table, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)