almond: split in half

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.62
, nut
Weight: 0.60
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, grape
Weight: 0.37
, apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, macadamia nut
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
split in half 1.00
split 0.90
split open 0.85
split evenly down middle 0.85
have split directly down middle 0.82
be in two halves 0.79
have two halves 0.79
split on tree 0.76
break cleanly in half 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nut, have two halves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(nut, be in two halves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(nut, break cleanly in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(nut, split in half)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(nut, be in two halves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nut, have two halves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nut, split in half)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nut, be in two halves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, have two halves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nut, break cleanly in half)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(grape, split)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pear, split on tree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(almond, split in half)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nut, have two halves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(almond, split in half)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(nut, be in two halves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(almond, split in half)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(nut, break cleanly in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(almond, split in half)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(grape, split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(grape, split)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pear, split on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pear, split on tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(almond, split in half)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nut, split in half)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nut, be in two halves)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(nut, have two halves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(grape, split)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pear, split on tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nut, split in half)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nut, be in two halves)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(nut, have two halves)