alternator: be put in parallel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor
Weight: 0.57
, source
Weight: 0.55
, device
Weight: 0.53
, pulley
Weight: 0.53
, electric motor
Weight: 0.52
Siblings internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.34
, car battery
Weight: 0.33
, brake
Weight: 0.33
, transformer
Weight: 0.33
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be put in parallel 1.00
be connected in parallel 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(alternator, be put in parallel)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be connected in parallel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(alternator, be connected in parallel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alternator, be connected in parallel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(alternator, be connected in parallel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be put in parallel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(alternator, be put in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be put in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(transformer, be connected in parallel)