aluminium: be more expensive than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than iron 1.00
was more expensive in 1850s 0.85
is less expensive 0.84
is less expensive ago 0.80
is less expensive then ago 0.80
is less expensive now ago 0.80
is less expensive now then ago 0.79
is expensive 0.79
was expensive 0.78
is less expensive then 150 years ago 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gold, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(copper, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(copper, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(copper, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(copper, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(aluminum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(gold, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gold, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminium, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aluminium, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(aluminium, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gold, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aluminum, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(copper, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)