aluminum: be more expensive than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than iron 1.00
be more reactive than iron 0.91
be lighter than iron 0.89
be more expensive than steel 0.88
be recycled than iron 0.85
was more expensive than gold 0.85
be less electronegative than copper 0.81
be better than wood 0.81
be more reactive than copper 0.80
be cheaper than gold 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(steel, be lighter than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(steel, be lighter than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(steel, be lighter than iron)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(aluminum, be recycled than iron)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be recycled than iron)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aluminum, be recycled than iron)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recycled than iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(steel, be lighter than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)