aluminum: be more expensive than steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than steel 1.00
be than steel 0.94
be better than steel 0.94
be stronger than steel 0.91
expand more than steel 0.89
be used instead of steel 0.88
be more expensive than iron 0.88
be preferred to steel 0.85
was more expensive than gold 0.85
be less electronegative than copper 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(titanium, be better than steel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aluminum, be than steel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be than steel)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(aluminum, be than steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be than steel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be used instead of steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(titanium, be better than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than iron)