aluminum: be stronger than steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than steel 1.00
be better than steel 0.96
be than steel 0.93
be more expensive than steel 0.91
expand more than steel 0.88
be used instead of steel 0.85
be preferred to steel 0.83
be better than wood 0.82
be better than plastic 0.80
build aircraft instead of steel 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(titanium, be better than steel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aluminum, be than steel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be than steel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(aluminum, be than steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be than steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(titanium, be better than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)