aluminum: be preferred to steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred to steel 1.00
be used instead of steel 0.90
be than steel 0.89
be better than steel 0.87
be more expensive than steel 0.85
be stronger than steel 0.83
build aircraft instead of steel 0.81
expand more than steel 0.80
be good choice of metal 0.78
be different from alloy of aluminum 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(titanium, be better than steel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(titanium, be stronger than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(titanium, be stronger than steel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aluminum, be than steel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(aluminum, be than steel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be than steel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aluminum, build aircraft instead of steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminum, be stronger than steel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(titanium, be better than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(titanium, be stronger than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than steel)