steel: be better than wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wood 1.00
feel colder than wood 0.90
be better than aluminium 0.84
be better than stone 0.83
be better than plastic 0.83
be harder than aluminum 0.83
be stronger than aluminum 0.83
be stronger than glass 0.81
be better reinforcement than aluminum 0.80
be cheaper than titanium 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(steel, be better than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steel, be better than plastic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than plastic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than aluminum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than wood)