steel: be cheaper than titanium

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than titanium 1.00
be harder than aluminum 0.84
be stronger than aluminum 0.84
be better than plastic 0.81
be better reinforcement than aluminum 0.80
be better than wood 0.77
be stronger than copper 0.77
become stainless steel 0.77
be called stainless steel 0.76
be called steel 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(steel, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than copper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steel, be better than plastic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than copper)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than plastic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than copper)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than copper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than aluminum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than wood)