steel: be better than plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than plastic 1.00
be better than aluminium 0.85
be better than wood 0.83
be stronger than glass 0.83
be harder than aluminum 0.82
be stronger than aluminum 0.82
be cheaper than titanium 0.81
be better reinforcement than aluminum 0.79
be better than stone 0.78
feel colder than wood 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be better than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steel, be better than plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(steel, be better than wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(steel, be cheaper than titanium)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be better than aluminium)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than aluminum)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than aluminum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than wood)