aluminum: be cheaper than gold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than gold 1.00
was more expensive than gold 0.94
have higher specific heat than gold 0.83
be less electronegative than copper 0.83
be more expensive than steel 0.81
be more expensive than iron 0.80
be more reactive than copper 0.78
expand more than copper 0.78
be better than plastic 0.76
be better than steel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(titanium, be better than steel)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(titanium, be better than steel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(titanium, be more expensive than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(titanium, be better than steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be cheaper than gold)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)