aluminum foil: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.71
, metal
Weight: 0.69
, foil
Weight: 0.59
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.39
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(foil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(foil, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)