plastic wrap: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.76
, material
Weight: 0.68
, packaging
Weight: 0.67
, container
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.35
, paper towel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(packaging, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(packaging, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silicone, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silicone, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)