silicone: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, gel
Weight: 0.66
, filler
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings resin
Weight: 0.37
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.36
, acrylic
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be bad to environment 0.99
is bad environment 0.98
be good for environment 0.97
be terrible for environment 0.93
be in environment 0.91
be dangerous to environment 0.88
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
has state environment 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(plastic, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(plastic, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(silicone, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)