plastic: be harmful to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to environment 1.00
be dangerous to environment 0.91
harm environment 0.89
affect environment 0.88
be bad to environment 0.88
be in environment 0.88
is bad environment 0.87
be bad for environment 0.86
be good for environment 0.85
pollute environment 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(plastic, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)