acrylic: affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.87
be good for environment 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(acrylic, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(acrylic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)