fiberglass: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.64
, substrate
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, surface
Weight: 0.62
, resin
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality good 0.77
be said to cycle through ecosystem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nylon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nylon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(nylon, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fiberglass, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(nylon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)