fiberglass: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.64
, substrate
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, surface
Weight: 0.62
, resin
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nylon, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nylon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(nylon, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fiberglass, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(nylon, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)