paper towel: be bad for environment

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.69 , restroom Weight: 0.66 , paper Weight: 0.62 , towel Weight: 0.61
Siblings	toilet paper Weight: 0.71 , tissue Weight: 0.56 , bounty Weight: 0.50 , beach towel Weight: 0.40 , white paper Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for environment	1.00
has quality bad	0.80
has quality good	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(towel, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(paper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(paper, has quality bad)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(paper, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(towel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(towel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(towel, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(paper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(paper towel, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(paper towel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(towel, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(towel, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)