amendment: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.73
, revision
Weight: 0.69
, provision
Weight: 0.68
, clause
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.64
Siblings plan
Weight: 0.69
, bill
Weight: 0.40
, legislation
Weight: 0.39
, measure
Weight: 0.37
, resolution
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be related to process 0.86
be important to writing process 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(revision, be important to writing process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(revision, be important to writing process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(revision, be important to writing process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be related to process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(revision, be important to writing process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(amendment, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(resolution, be related to process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(amendment, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(revision, be important to writing process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(resolution, be related to process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(amendment, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(revision, be important to writing process)