amide: has shape bases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.66
, group
Weight: 0.60
, linkage
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings amino acid
Weight: 0.36
, amine
Weight: 0.35
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.34
, methyl
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has shape bases 1.00
is weak bases 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amine, has shape bases)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(amine, is weak bases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(amine, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(amine, has shape bases)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(amine, is weak bases)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amine, is weak bases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(amide, has shape bases)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(amide, is weak bases)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(amide, is weak bases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amide, is weak bases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amide, has shape bases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(amine, has shape bases)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(amine, is weak bases)