amide: is weak bases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.66
, group
Weight: 0.60
, linkage
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings amino acid
Weight: 0.36
, amine
Weight: 0.35
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.34
, methyl
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weak bases 1.00
has shape bases 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(amine, is weak bases)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amine, has shape bases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(amine, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amine, is weak bases)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(amine, has shape bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(amine, has shape bases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(amide, is weak bases)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(amide, has shape bases)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(amide, has shape bases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amide, has shape bases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amide, has shape bases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amide, is weak bases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(amine, is weak bases)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amide, is weak bases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(amine, has shape bases)