amphibian: be important to humans

Related concepts

Parents	vertebrate Weight: 0.65 , animal Weight: 0.64 , organism Weight: 0.62 , creature Weight: 0.61 , thing Weight: 0.56
Siblings	tree frog Weight: 0.77 , newt Weight: 0.66 , turtle Weight: 0.66 , frog Weight: 0.64 , lizard Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to humans	1.00
affect humans	0.92
be different from other vertebrates	0.78
be different from vertebrates	0.78
be classified as vertebrates	0.77
be considered animals	0.77
is animals	0.77
be vertebrates	0.76
is vertebrates	0.76
be different from other other classes of vertebrates	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(amphibian, be important to humans)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(amphibian, be important to humans)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(vertebrate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(amphibian, be important to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is animals)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is animals)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(tree frog, affect humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(vertebrate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(tree frog, affect humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(tree frog, affect humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(amphibian, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(amphibian, is animals)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(amphibian, is vertebrates)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(amphibian, be vertebrates)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(amphibian, is animals)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(amphibian, is vertebrates)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(amphibian, be vertebrates)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(amphibian, is animals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(amphibian, is vertebrates)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(amphibian, be vertebrates)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is animals)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be vertebrates)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is vertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(amphibian, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(animal, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(tree frog, affect humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(amphibian, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(animal, is animals)