vertebrate: be considered animals

Related concepts

Parents	organism Weight: 0.69 , species Weight: 0.58 , chordate Weight: 0.58 , phylum Weight: 0.57 , invertebrate Weight: 0.54
Siblings	amphibian Weight: 0.65 , salamander Weight: 0.63 , human cell Weight: 0.62 , lamprey Weight: 0.47 , diatom Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered animals	1.00
is animals	0.93
be considered complex animals	0.90
be different from animals	0.87
be different from other animals	0.85
differ from animals	0.82
differ from other animals	0.81
be grouped in animal kingdom	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is animals)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(chordate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(chordate, is animals)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(amphibian, is animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(amphibian, is animals)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is animals)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from animals)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is animals)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(vertebrate, differ from animals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from animals)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, differ from animals)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, differ from other animals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(vertebrate, is animals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(vertebrate, differ from other animals)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, differ from animals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from animals)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(vertebrate, differ from animals)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, differ from other animals)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(vertebrate, differ from other animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(amphibian, is animals)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)