vertebrate: be grouped in animal kingdom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be grouped in animal kingdom 1.00
be grouped 0.81
be different from other animals 0.79
be different from animals 0.79
be considered animals 0.77
be considered complex animals 0.75
is animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, be grouped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chordate, is animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(species, be grouped)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chordate, is animals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(species, be grouped)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, be grouped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(amphibian, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be grouped)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(vertebrate, is animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(species, be grouped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amphibian, is animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(vertebrate, be grouped in animal kingdom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(species, be grouped)