vertebrate: be considered complex animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered complex animals 1.00
be considered animals 0.90
be more complex 0.85
is animals 0.84
be different from animals 0.83
has state complex 0.83
have complex systems 0.82
be different from other animals 0.81
differ from animals 0.77
have complex nervous systems 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chordate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chordate, is animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chordate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(invertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(amphibian, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, differ from animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, differ from animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(vertebrate, is animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, differ from animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vertebrate, differ from animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amphibian, is animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chordate, is animals)