amphibian: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(turtle, defend themselves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(turtle, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(turtle, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(turtle, defend themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(turtle, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(turtle, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(amphibian, defend themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amphibian, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(turtle, defend themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(turtle, protect themselves)