analysis: be important for organization

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , risk Weight: 0.59 , journal Weight: 0.59 , projection Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.76 , report Weight: 0.67 , review Weight: 0.60 , insight Weight: 0.59 , reporting Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important for organization	1.00
be important to service organizations	0.83
be important to human service organizations	0.82
be important for business	0.79
be important in business	0.76
take important in leadership	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(analysis, be important for organization)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(risk, take important in leadership) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(analysis, be important for organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(risk, take important in leadership)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(risk, take important in leadership)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(review, be important for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important for organization)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(risk, take important in leadership) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important for organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(review, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(review, be important for business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(report, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(analysis, be important for organization)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(analysis, be important to service organizations)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(analysis, be important to service organizations)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(analysis, be important to human service organizations)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(analysis, be important to human service organizations)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important to service organizations)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important to human service organizations)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in business)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important to service organizations)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important to human service organizations)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(analysis, be important for organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(risk, take important in leadership)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(review, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(risk, take important in leadership)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(analysis, be important for organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)