analysis: be relevant for investing

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , risk Weight: 0.59 , journal Weight: 0.59 , projection Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.76 , report Weight: 0.67 , review Weight: 0.60 , insight Weight: 0.59 , reporting Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be relevant for investing	1.00
be important for business	0.77
be important in business	0.77
be important to investors	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(review, be important for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(report, be important to investors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(report, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(report, be important to investors) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(report, be important to investors)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(review, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(review, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(report, be important to investors)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(review, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)