report: be important to investors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to investors 1.00
be important to shareholders 0.79
be relevant for investing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(report, be important to investors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(analysis, be relevant for investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(report, be important to investors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important to investors)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(report, be important to shareholders)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to shareholders)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(report, be important to shareholders)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(report, be important to shareholders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to investors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(report, be important to investors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(report, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, be relevant for investing)