analyst: adjust data

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, third party
Weight: 0.55
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
adjust data 1.00
adjust financial data 0.94
calculate ratios 0.76
calculate financial ratios 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(analyst, adjust data)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(analyst, calculate financial ratios)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(analyst, adjust data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(analyst, adjust data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(analyst, adjust data)