analyst: calculate financial ratios

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, third party
Weight: 0.55
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
calculate financial ratios 1.00
calculate ratios 0.97
adjust financial data 0.83
adjust data 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(analyst, calculate ratios)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(analyst, adjust data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(analyst, adjust data)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(analyst, adjust financial data)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(analyst, adjust data)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(analyst, adjust data)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(analyst, calculate financial ratios)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analyst, calculate financial ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(analyst, calculate financial ratios)