ancient: was architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.49
, piece
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, coin
Weight: 0.42
Siblings antiquity
Weight: 0.32
, civilization
Weight: 0.31
, artifact
Weight: 0.31
, serpent
Weight: 0.30
, divination
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was architecture 1.00
was architecture important 0.98
was roman architecture 0.90
was roman architecture important 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ancient, was architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ancient, was roman architecture important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ancient, was architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture)