ancient: was architecture important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.49
, piece
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, coin
Weight: 0.42
Siblings antiquity
Weight: 0.32
, civilization
Weight: 0.31
, artifact
Weight: 0.31
, serpent
Weight: 0.30
, divination
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was architecture important 1.00
was architecture 0.98
was roman architecture important 0.91
was roman architecture 0.88
be important art 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ancient, was architecture important)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was architecture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ancient, was architecture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ancient, was architecture)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ancient, be important art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ancient, was roman architecture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ancient, be important art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ancient, was roman architecture important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ancient, be important art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ancient, be important art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was architecture important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ancient, was architecture important)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ancient, was architecture important)