ancient: was chinese paper money used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.49
, piece
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, coin
Weight: 0.42
Siblings antiquity
Weight: 0.32
, civilization
Weight: 0.31
, artifact
Weight: 0.31
, serpent
Weight: 0.30
, divination
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chinese paper money used 1.00
was chinese paper money 0.99
was paper money used 0.89
was chinese food 0.87
was chinese food made 0.87
was chinese pottery used 0.82
was chinese pottery 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese food made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese food made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese food made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese food made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)