ancient: was chinese pottery used

Property	Similarity
was chinese pottery used	1.00
was chinese pottery	0.99
was pottery used	0.94
was chinese food	0.83
was chinese paper money used	0.82
was chinese food made	0.82
was chinese paper money	0.81
be important roman art	0.76
were eygptian craftsmen	0.75

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese food made)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese food made)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese food made)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese food made)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(ancient, was chinese paper money used)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(ancient, be important roman art)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(ancient, were eygptian craftsmen)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(ancient, were eygptian craftsmen)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(ancient, be important roman art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ancient, be important roman art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(ancient, were eygptian craftsmen)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(ancient, were eygptian craftsmen)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(ancient, was chinese pottery used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(ancient, be important roman art)

Parents	subject Weight: 0.49 , piece Weight: 0.48 , topic Weight: 0.47 , thing Weight: 0.47 , coin Weight: 0.42
Siblings	antiquity Weight: 0.32 , civilization Weight: 0.31 , artifact Weight: 0.31 , serpent Weight: 0.30 , divination Weight: 0.30

ancient: was chinese pottery used

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible