andes: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mountain range
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.41
, region
Weight: 0.40
, experience
Weight: 0.38
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.27
, alp
Weight: 0.27
, black hills
Weight: 0.26
, alps
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality variety 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(andes, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(andes, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(andes, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(andes, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(andes, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(andes, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(andes, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(andes, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality variety)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(andes, has quality variety)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(andes, has quality variety)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(andes, has quality variety)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(andes, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(andes, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)