android: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents linux
Weight: 0.67
, cell phone
Weight: 0.64
, smartphone
Weight: 0.64
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.63
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, nokia
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.35
, motorola
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
have bad snapchat quality 0.98
has quality better 0.90
look bad on snapchat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(linux, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(samsung, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(iphone, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(android, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(linux, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(android, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(samsung, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(samsung, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(iphone, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iphone, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(android, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(android, have bad snapchat quality)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(android, have bad snapchat quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(android, have bad snapchat quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(android, have bad snapchat quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(android, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(android, look bad on snapchat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(android, look bad on snapchat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(android, look bad on snapchat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(android, look bad on snapchat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(android, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(android, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(samsung, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iphone, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)