animal: be at pet store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pet store 1.00
be at pet shop 0.96
be pet 0.94
be used to pet 0.94
be use as pet 0.90
be keep as pet 0.89
be at cat family 0.82
be used to cuddly pet 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cougar, be at cat family)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(llama, be pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(llama, be pet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(llama, be pet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cougar, be at cat family)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cougar, be at cat family)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(animal, be at pet store)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(animal, be pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(animal, be used to pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(llama, be pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cougar, be at cat family)