animal: be pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pet 1.00
be used to pet 0.99
be use as pet 0.94
be at pet store 0.94
be keep as pet 0.93
be at pet shop 0.92
be used to cuddly pet 0.86
be at cat family 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cougar, be at cat family)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(llama, be pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(llama, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(llama, be pet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cougar, be at cat family) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cougar, be at cat family)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(animal, be pet)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(animal, be at pet store)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(animal, be used to pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(llama, be pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cougar, be at cat family)