animal: be used to food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to food 1.00
be used to kill for food 0.84
note food 0.79
hunt for food 0.79
eat fish 0.76
has meat 0.76
eat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(badger, eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(llama, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(badger, eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(badger, eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(llama, eat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(llama, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(animal, be used to food)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat fish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(animal, eat fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animal, note food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(animal, eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(animal, note food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, note food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(animal, eat fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(animal, note food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, eat fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(badger, eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(llama, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)