animal: has bone inside of them

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
has bone inside of them 1.00
has bone 0.91
has big tooth 0.76
has live body while computer do not 0.75
has muscle 0.75
has even number of leg 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cougar, has big tooth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cougar, has big tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cougar, has big tooth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(animal, has bone inside of them)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(animal, has bone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(animal, has bone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(animal, has bone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, has bone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(animal, has even number of leg)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(animal, has muscle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(animal, has muscle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(animal, has muscle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(animal, has even number of leg)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(animal, has even number of leg)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(animal, has even number of leg)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(animal, has muscle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has bone inside of them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, has bone inside of them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cougar, has big tooth)